Add Us To Your Favorites!

About the Editor You know, my faith is one that admits little doubt...

Preliminary Results of Upland Game Bird Brood Production in Wisconsin Present Mixed Picture

Posted by ODC Editor on Sep 9th, 2008 and filed under Hunting. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

MADISON — Variable spring weather and habitat conditions in Wisconsin in 2008 created conditions for upland game bird brood rearing that were slightly cooler and much wetter than in 2007, according to analysis of annual game brood surveys conducted by state wildlife biologists around the state.

Cool and very wet conditions occurred for some of the critical early brood rearing season, while most of the later brood rearing period had average temperatures and rainfall during the summer of 2008.

“Much of the southern third of the state experienced large and frequent rain events early in the brood rearing season, when chicks are just hatching and have a hard time regulating their body temperature,” says Sharon Fandel, assistant upland wildlife ecologist with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. “These events did not occur statewide, but probably did have an impact on local brood survival.”

Each year, DNR field staff report the number and size of game bird broods they observe in the field from June 15 through August 23. At the end of the survey period, these reports, known as the 10-Week Brood Survey are complied and summarized by the wildlife research program.

Statewide, Fandel says, the 2008 brood rearing season was somewhat worse than 2007, which was an average to above average brood rearing season. The following are survey results for the turkey, ruffed grouse and pheasant surveys.

Turkeys

Turkeys showed a 12 percent decrease in the number of broods seen per observer and an 8 percent decrease in the size of the broods seen. In 2008, DNR field personnel averaged 3.5 turkey broods seen during the survey period, down from the 4.0 broods per observer in 2007.

“But this was still well above the long-term mean of 1.6 broods seen,” Fandel notes.

The average size of a brood seen in 2008 was 4.5 young per brood, while in 2007 the average brood size was 4.9 young per brood.

“While statewide averages show only a slight decline in turkey brood production, heavy sustained rains early in the brood season in the southwestern parts of the state likely had an impact on local production,” she says.

Pheasants

Fandel says pheasants did not fair as well as turkeys from the early June rains and most of Wisconsin’s primarily pheasant range was affected by these weather events.

“Pheasant numbers will be down this fall compared to last fall’s hunting season. The number of pheasant broods seen per observer was down 42 percent from last year, and 52 percent below the long-term average,” she says.

Average size of the brood was down as well with 4.5 young per brood in 2008 compared to 5.1 in 2007. The Rural Mail Carrier and the Spring Breeding Pheasant surveys both also showed a decrease in the number of breeding pheasants in the spring of 2008. Production is additionally likely impacted by declining grassland habitat throughout the pheasant range.

Ruffed Grouse

Ruffed Grouse - Photo courtesy of Paul CarsonThe primary range for ruffed grouse, the Central and Northern forest portions of the state, were mostly spared from the heavy rain events of June. The average number of broods seen and the average size of the brood both increased 12 percent from 2007 levels.

DNR field personnel averaged 1.03 broods seen during the 2008 survey period, compared to 0.92 in 2007. Brood size was up as well with broods averaging 4.7 young per brood, 4.2 in 2007.

“There was also had an increase in the number of breeding ruffed grouse shown in the spring drumming counts,” Fandel says. “While some areas of the state surely saw losses from spring rains, it appears that ruffed grouse numbers this fall will be better than in the previous three to four years and are well on their way to their cyclic high.”

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Fandel – (608) 261-8458

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement

Photo Gallery

 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up

Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.
image linking to 100 Top Bass Fishing Sites image linking to 100 Top Saltwater Fishing Sites image linking to 100 Top Fly Fishing Sites image linking to 100 Top Walleye Sites image linking to 100 Top Small Game Sites image linking to 100 Top Birds and Waterfowl Sites hunting and fishing clubs monster list by state